Failover Without DNS Latency: BGP Anycast for Critical Infrastructure Platforms
In traditional high availability scenarios, DNS (Domain Name System) is the standard tool for …

For an online shop in the mid-sized business or D2C sector, downtime is much more than a technical nuisance. Every minute of unavailability means direct revenue loss, decreased customer trust, and wasted budget on ongoing marketing campaigns.
Agencies aiming to grow and manage larger brands cannot avoid the demand for Service Level Agreements (SLAs) of 99.9%. However, this level of availability cannot be physically guaranteed with a classic single-server setup. A hardware defect, a stalled database process, or a simple kernel panic on the host system immediately leads to a standstill. High availability requires a rethinking of architecture: moving away from single servers to distributed systems.
The first step towards high availability in a Kubernetes environment is the horizontal distribution of the Shopware instance. Instead of running the shop as one large process, it is divided into several small, identical units (Pods).
The database is often the bottleneck and the most critical “Single Point of Failure.” For 99.9% availability, we rely on highly available database clusters (e.g., MariaDB or MySQL with Galera or Group Replication):
To allow multiple shop Pods to work simultaneously, they must share information without blocking each other:
True high availability for Shopware is not a “feature” that can simply be switched on but is the result of a consistently well-thought-out infrastructure. By combining orchestral distribution, database clustering, and centralized session management, we eliminate the Single Point of Failure.
For the agency, this means no longer fearing hardware failures at the host. For the shop operator, it means absolute reliability, even when traffic massively increases or maintenance work is being carried out in the background.
Why isn’t a backup enough for high availability? A backup secures the data but not the operation. A restore after a server failure often takes hours. High availability aims to make the failure imperceptible through redundancy.
What is the difference between vertical and horizontal scaling? Vertical (Scale-up) means giving an existing server more CPU or RAM—this has physical limits and often requires a restart. Horizontal (Scale-out) means adding more instances (Pods). This happens during operation and provides true redundancy.
Does a high-availability architecture make the shop slower? On the contrary. By distributing the load across multiple instances and using fast in-memory databases for caching (Redis), response times usually improve noticeably, especially under load.
How is traffic distributed across the different Pods? A Load Balancer (Ingress Controller) in the Kubernetes cluster receives all requests and intelligently distributes them to the healthy Pods. It automatically detects when a Pod is not ready and removes it from the distribution.
Do high-availability setups cost significantly more? Infrastructure costs increase slightly because more instances are running. However, this effort is negligible compared to the costs of a multi-hour total failure during a high-revenue phase like Black Friday. Additionally, Kubernetes optimizes resource utilization more efficiently than traditional VMs.
In traditional high availability scenarios, DNS (Domain Name System) is the standard tool for …
In an industrial concept, millions of data points are generated daily. When these data flow into …
In modern manufacturing, data is generated not in batches, but as a continuous stream. Sensors on …