Why Europe Doesn’t Need Hyperscalers

But Rather Better Cloud Architectures

For years, the European cloud debate has been dominated by a seemingly simple question: Does Europe need its own hyperscalers?

Politics, business, and media regularly discuss whether Europe should build a technological counterpart to the major platform providers from the USA. Billion-dollar programs, funding projects, and initiatives aim to create a “European cloud” that can compete with the large global platform ecosystems.

But perhaps this question has been wrong from the start.

Europe doesn’t need to build new hyperscalers. Europe primarily needs better cloud architectures.

Because the real dependency doesn’t arise from infrastructure alone – but from the way modern platforms are built.

---

The Misunderstanding of Hyperscaler Logic

Hyperscalers are primarily platform ecosystems.

They combine infrastructure, platform services, development tools, and operational environments into an integrated system. Databases, messaging systems, AI services, observability, identity management, CI/CD, and monitoring are deeply intertwined.

For development teams, this is extremely attractive. New services can be quickly integrated, platform functions are immediately available, and many complex infrastructure problems are solved by the platform itself.

But this integration has a structural effect:

It shifts control from the architecture of the system to the provider’s platform.

The more applications rely on platform-specific services, the harder it becomes to leave that platform later. Data structures, APIs, and operational models are closely interwoven.

The result is not a technical lock-in in the classical sense – but an ecosystemic lock-in.

And this is where the real problem lies.

---

Infrastructure Is Not the Problem

Europe already has an enormous amount of digital infrastructure.

Data centers, networks, infrastructure providers, and hosting companies exist in large numbers. Technologically, many of these providers are absolutely competitive. Modern hardware, global network connectivity, and automated platforms are long-standing standards.

The real challenge, therefore, does not lie in a lack of infrastructure.

It lies in the architecture of modern platforms.

Hyperscalers have succeeded in turning infrastructure into an integrated software product. Applications no longer just run on servers – they run within a complete platform ecosystem.

If Europe tries to simply copy this model, it will always lag behind.

The crucial step is different:

Europe must rethink the architecture of the cloud.

---

The Opportunity of Cloud-Native Architecture

Interestingly, the right technologies are emerging for this very purpose.

Containerization, Kubernetes, Infrastructure as Code, and GitOps have created a new platform layer in recent years. Applications can now run on standardized platform layers that operate independently of the underlying infrastructure.

This development changes the power balance of the cloud.

When applications consistently rely on open standards, infrastructure becomes interchangeable again. Workloads can be moved between different environments – from public cloud to private cloud, from on-premise to colocation, or between different providers.

The platform then no longer belongs to the infrastructure operator.

It belongs to the operator of the architecture.

---

Cloud Sovereignty Is an Architecture Problem

In many political discussions, digital sovereignty is often associated with geographical questions: Where is the data center located? Which provider operates the infrastructure? In which country is data stored?

These questions are important – but they fall short.

Digital sovereignty does not arise solely from the location of a server. It arises from technical control over:

• Infrastructure
• Data
• Platform architecture
• Automation
• Software supply chain

Whoever controls these layers can exchange infrastructure, switch platforms, and adapt technologies.

Those who do not control them remain dependent – regardless of where the servers are physically located.

---

A Different Model for Cloud Platforms

This is where an alternative approach comes in.

Instead of building another closed platform ecosystem, cloud architectures can consciously build on open technologies and modular platforms.

In this model, the platform itself becomes the central instance – not the infrastructure provider.

The architecture follows some central principles:

• Infrastructure remains interchangeable
• Platform functions are based on open standards
• Deployments are reproducible
• Platforms can be operated automatically
• Applications remain portable

These principles are not theoretical. They can already be technically implemented today.

---

Infrastructure Automation as the Key

The decisive factor for this new cloud architecture is automation.

In modern platforms, infrastructure is no longer operated manually. It is fully described through declarative configurations and implemented automatically.

Infrastructure as Code, GitOps, and automated deployments ensure that platforms can be built reproducibly.

This means:

A complete platform can be built identically on different infrastructures.

And this is where the real foundation for digital sovereignty lies.

---

How This Architecture Works in Practice

At ayedo, we follow exactly this approach.

Our platform architecture is based on open cloud-native technologies like Kubernetes, containerization, and infrastructure-as-code principles. Applications are not tied to individual infrastructure providers but run on standardized platform layers.

The crucial building block for this architecture is Polycrate.

Polycrate is an automation framework for platform teams and system administrators that automates the entire software delivery lifecycle – from infrastructure provisioning to deployment to operation.

Polycrate connects several layers of modern platform architecture:

• Configuration management
• Container orchestration
• CI/CD
• Cloud provisioning
• Observability
• Infrastructure automation

All these processes run through a unified workflow.

---

Deterministic Infrastructure Instead of Platform Magic

A central problem of many cloud platforms is intransparency.

Many platform services operate on the principle of “platform magic.” Developers use APIs or services without knowing exactly what infrastructure is behind them or how it is operated.

This accelerates development – but at the same time reduces control.

Polycrate takes a different approach: deterministic infrastructure.

Every infrastructure change is described as declarative code. Deployments run reproducibly, independent of the local development environment. Automation processes are transparent, versioned, and auditable.

The result is a platform that remains fully comprehensible.

---

Infrastructure Becomes Portable Again

A key advantage of this approach is portability.

Since platforms are no longer tied to specific infrastructure services, workloads can be moved between different environments.

A platform can, for example, run on:

• Public cloud
• Private cloud
• Bare-metal infrastructure
• Colocation data centers
• Hybrid environments

Polycrate orchestrates infrastructure automation across all these environments.

For companies, this means a new form of technological agility.

---

Compliance Becomes Part of the Architecture

Another advantage of this architecture is evident in the area of regulation.

New European regulations like NIS-2, DORA, CRA, or the Data Act impose high requirements on traceability, security, and portability of digital systems.

However, many platform ecosystems are not built for these requirements. They are based on proprietary services and complex platform structures.

In a fully automated platform architecture, these requirements can be directly technically mapped:

• Audit logs for all infrastructure changes
• Automated compliance proofs
• Reproducible deployments
• Transparent software supply chains
• Documented exit strategies

Compliance thus becomes part of the platform architecture – not subsequent documentation.

---

Europe’s Real Opportunity

Europe is unlikely to produce new hyperscalers that directly replace the existing platform giants.

But perhaps that is not necessary.

The future of the cloud may be less shaped by gigantic platform ecosystems – and more by open, interoperable platform architectures.

Architectures that are based on open standards, operated automatically, and consciously keep infrastructure interchangeable.

Europe already has the technologies, infrastructure, and expertise to build exactly such platforms.

The crucial question is therefore not:

How do we build the next hyperscaler?

The crucial question is:

How do we build cloud architectures that no longer need a hyperscaler?