<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>It-Abh-Ngigkeiten on ayedo</title>
    <link>https://ayedo.de/en/tags/it-abh-ngigkeiten/</link>
    <description>Recent content in It-Abh-Ngigkeiten on ayedo</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:57:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ayedo.de/en/tags/it-abh-ngigkeiten/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Weekly Backlog Week 3/2026</title>
      <link>https://ayedo.de/en/backlog/weekly-backlog-kw-3-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ayedo.de/en/backlog/weekly-backlog-kw-3-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://ayedo.de/backlog/weekly-backlog-kw-3-2026/weekly-backlog-kw-3-2026.png&#34; alt=&#34;&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;-editorial&#34;&gt;🧠 Editorial&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Digital sovereignty is often invoked as long as it remains &lt;strong&gt;abstract&lt;/strong&gt;. As a target image. As a vision. As a strategy paper. However, as soon as it demands &lt;strong&gt;concrete decisions&lt;/strong&gt;—different providers, different contracts, different responsibilities—it becomes uncomfortable. This week, it becomes very clear &lt;strong&gt;who truly means sovereignty&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;who merely manages it&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Studies, reports, and real projects paint a consistent picture: &lt;strong&gt;The dependencies are known&lt;/strong&gt;, the alternatives exist, the knowledge is available. &lt;strong&gt;What is missing is consistency.&lt;/strong&gt; And the willingness to &lt;strong&gt;trade short-term convenience for long-term control&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
